An interesting article in The Economist spoke about governments that are forced into innovation.
They are running out of funds.
The UK has just instituted a budget cut: They need to find savings of nearly 40% across the government.
Services we have taken for granted — we will have to pay. “Life event services” such as recycling require a charge. Immigrants have to pay a £200 charge regarding the National Health Services program, whether they use it or not, upon entrance to the country. What’s most fascinating is looking at the courts. If you’re in a criminal court and you plead not guilty and then are convicted, you owe serious charges for the court time and the prosecutor fees. Divorce or taking up an issue with a tenant will cost you.
What about the luxury of driving? Many parking spaces are no longer free. And if you enter the busy downtown route in London, you pay a charge of about $15. This keeps congestion down, and public transportation up.
In part, it is trying to ensure that people stay honest; in part it simply makes them more grateful.
What do you think? Do you like the UK’s government’s new approach to services?
I appreciate very much that people are being innovative. We do need to be more creative.
We need to save the environment.
It makes us pause before we simply act– and sometimes rashly, out of anger, or hurt. You are paying emotionally, and with your wallet! …. could we handle this in a different way? A more personal way, using our emotional relationship building skills rather than the courts?
I like that it holds us accountable.
I always appreciate becoming humbler…it’s a deep soul penetrating sense of gratitude for every little thing….
I also hope that it is not penalizing a sincere user of the service. Therefore:
Could for-profits create some services, and support new jobs with excellence in client service? We reduce a bloated government, provide greater efficiency, more jobs, more competitiveness in pricing and excellence in client service?
Could nonprofits support the deserving, documented requests and help the people most affected? Donors who contribute — pick the person and story they want to fund. It could also create a personal connection not existing now, contributing to a longterm relationship and support. That’s also a stronger, more bonded community.
My view is that some of these government charges will be necessary. At the same time I hope that this will be an opportunity for our forprofit and philanthropic sectors to step up and provide.
I look forward to hearing your thoughts!